BPC‑157 vs TB‑500: what each was tested for, and in whom

BPC-157 has six small human reports and TB-500 none of its own; both were tested on tendons only in rats. Neither is FDA-approved, and both are banned in sport as of October 2026.

7 minute read 21 sources Reviewed October 15, 2026

The short answer

For a tendon, the only head‑to‑head data is one 2026 study of 32 rats: TB‑500 gave stronger repaired Achilles tendons than no treatment, BPC‑157 also helped but not by a statistically clear margin, and giving both added nothing. In people, BPC‑157 has six small reports, none of them a controlled injury trial, and TB‑500 has never been tested on its own. For the gut, BPC‑157 is the only one of the two with research, from rats and one colitis enema trial that did not clearly beat placebo.

Every claim on this page is labeled by what was tested: in people, in animals or cells, or a regulatory fact. How we grade evidence: editorial policy.

At a glance
ItemBPC‑157TB‑500
What it isLab-made 15-amino-acid fragment of a protein found in human gastric juiceLab-made 7-amino-acid fragment of thymosin beta-4 (positions 17 to 23) with an acetyl cap
Tested in people forUlcerative colitis, knee pain, interstitial cystitis and IV safety, in small studiesNothing yet; one heart-disease trial began recruiting in 2026
Evidence labelTested in people (tiny, mostly uncontrolled); healing data in ratsTested in animals or cells only
FDA statusNot approved; cannot be compounded; advisory vote 8-6 in favorNot approved; cannot be compounded; advisory vote 8-6 in favor
WADA 2026Banned at all times, named under S0Banned at all times, named under S2
Last checkedOctober 15, 2026October 15, 2026
The daily email

Peptide news each morning, with the study linked

New trials, FDA changes and side-effect reports, written in plain English. Every result says whether it was tested in people or in animals.

Free. One email a morning. Unsubscribe in one click.

BPC‑157 vs TB‑500, side by side

Each row names its evidence type. Every study named here is linked in the sources list at the bottom of the page.

BPC-157 and TB-500 compared, checked October 15, 2026
BPC-157TB-500Evidence type
Largest human study53 adults with ulcerative colitis, BPC-157 enema vs placebo, published only as a meeting abstract (Ruenzi, 2005)None. FDA's 2026 review found no study in which TB-500 was given to a personTested in people
Placebo-controlled result in peopleColitis scores fell 3.2 points on BPC-157 and 1.6 on placebo; FDA found the gap was not statistically clearNo placebo-controlled trial has reported resultsTested in people
Same rat tendon study, 2026Repaired Achilles tendons trended stronger and healthier than untreated ones, without a statistically clear marginRepaired Achilles tendons held more load and scored better on two tissue scales than untreated onesTested in animals or cells
Other animal healing work35 preclinical studies on muscle, tendon, ligament and bone injuries, counted by a 2025 systematic reviewFDA found no animal study showing the fragment heals wounds; most animal data used full-length thymosin beta-4Tested in animals or cells
In cell testsMade rat tendon cells migrate faster and survive oxidative stress (Chang, 2011)Did not speed wound closure in fibroblasts; one breakdown fragment, Ac-LKKTE, did (Rahaman, 2024)Tested in animals or cells
How it is thought to workNo confirmed receptor; FDA wrote in 2026 that its molecular targets have not been identifiedIts parent protein binds actin, which cells need to move; not shown for the fragment in a living bodyTested in animals or cells
How long it lastsHalf-life under 30 minutes in animal studies; never measured in peopleNever measured in people; a breakdown fragment, Ac-LKK, was found in rat urine up to 72 hoursTested in animals or cells
Side effects seen in peopleHeadache and flatulence in the healthy-volunteer enema study, with no obvious difference from placeboNone characterized; no human study exists, and FDA's adverse event search found no TB-500 reportsTested in people
Registered trials, October 2026Two registered: hamstring strain against placebo (120 people, China, recruiting) and rotator cuff surgery against no treatment (30 people, US, not yet recruiting)One: heart disease blood markers (80 people, China, recruiting)Regulatory fact
Sport (WADA 2026)Named under S0, non-approved substances; banned in and out of competitionNamed under S2 growth factors as a thymosin beta-4 derivative; banned in and out of competitionRegulatory fact
US status, October 2026Not approved. Advisory committee voted 8-6 for compounding after FDA reviewed it for ulcerative colitis; no FDA ruleNot approved. A separate vote, also 8-6, after FDA reviewed it for wound healing; no FDA ruleRegulatory fact
  1. Largest human study tested in people BPC‑15753 adults with ulcerative colitis, BPC-157 enema vs placebo, published only as a meeting abstract (Ruenzi, 2005) TB‑500None. FDA's 2026 review found no study in which TB-500 was given to a person
  2. Placebo-controlled result in people tested in people BPC‑157Colitis scores fell 3.2 points on BPC-157 and 1.6 on placebo; FDA found the gap was not statistically clear TB‑500No placebo-controlled trial has reported results
  3. Same rat tendon study, 2026 tested in animals or cells BPC‑157Repaired Achilles tendons trended stronger and healthier than untreated ones, without a statistically clear margin TB‑500Repaired Achilles tendons held more load and scored better on two tissue scales than untreated ones
  4. Other animal healing work tested in animals or cells BPC‑15735 preclinical studies on muscle, tendon, ligament and bone injuries, counted by a 2025 systematic review TB‑500FDA found no animal study showing the fragment heals wounds; most animal data used full-length thymosin beta-4
  5. In cell tests tested in animals or cells BPC‑157Made rat tendon cells migrate faster and survive oxidative stress (Chang, 2011) TB‑500Did not speed wound closure in fibroblasts; one breakdown fragment, Ac-LKKTE, did (Rahaman, 2024)
  6. How it is thought to work tested in animals or cells BPC‑157No confirmed receptor; FDA wrote in 2026 that its molecular targets have not been identified TB‑500Its parent protein binds actin, which cells need to move; not shown for the fragment in a living body
  7. How long it lasts tested in animals or cells BPC‑157Half-life under 30 minutes in animal studies; never measured in people TB‑500Never measured in people; a breakdown fragment, Ac-LKK, was found in rat urine up to 72 hours
  8. Side effects seen in people tested in people BPC‑157Headache and flatulence in the healthy-volunteer enema study, with no obvious difference from placebo TB‑500None characterized; no human study exists, and FDA's adverse event search found no TB-500 reports
  9. Registered trials, October 2026 regulatory fact BPC‑157Two registered: hamstring strain against placebo (120 people, China, recruiting) and rotator cuff surgery against no treatment (30 people, US, not yet recruiting) TB‑500One: heart disease blood markers (80 people, China, recruiting)
  10. Sport (WADA 2026) regulatory fact BPC‑157Named under S0, non-approved substances; banned in and out of competition TB‑500Named under S2 growth factors as a thymosin beta-4 derivative; banned in and out of competition
  11. US status, October 2026 regulatory fact BPC‑157Not approved. Advisory committee voted 8-6 for compounding after FDA reviewed it for ulcerative colitis; no FDA rule TB‑500Not approved. A separate vote, also 8-6, after FDA reviewed it for wound healing; no FDA rule

What is the difference between BPC‑157 and TB‑500?

They are unrelated molecules with different evidence. BPC-157 is a 15-amino-acid piece of a stomach protein and has six small human reports. TB-500 is a 7-amino-acid piece of thymosin beta-4 and has none of its own.

BPC-157 was first described in 1993 by a group at the University of Zagreb in Croatia, as a fragment of a protein found in human gastric juice. Its rat studies cover cut tendons, gut ulcers and colitis. FDA reviewers wrote in 2026 that its molecular targets have not been identified (tested in animals or cells).

TB-500 is the seven amino acids at positions 17 to 23 of thymosin beta-4, the part of that protein tied to actin binding, with an acetyl group added to the front. A Belgian anti-doping lab confirmed in 2012 that products sold as TB-500 contain this fragment (Esposito, 2012). FDA's 2026 review states that TB-500 and thymosin beta-4 are not the same substance, so trials of the full protein say nothing direct about TB-500.

BPC‑157
  1. Gly
  2. Glu
  3. Pro
  4. Pro
  5. Pro
  6. Gly
  7. Lys
  8. Pro
  9. Ala
  10. Asp
  11. Asp
  12. Ala
  13. Gly
  14. Leu
  15. Val
Lab-made 15-amino-acid fragment of a protein found in human gastric juice
TB‑500
  1. Leu
  2. Lys
  3. Lys
  4. Thr
  5. Glu
  6. Thr
  7. Gln
Lab-made 7-amino-acid fragment of thymosin beta-4 (positions 17 to 23) with an acetyl cap
BPC-157 has 15 amino acids. TB-500 has 7, with an acetyl group capping the front. The two chains share no stretch of sequence.

Is BPC‑157 or TB‑500 better for tendon injuries?

Neither has been tested on a tendon in people. In the one rat study that tested both, TB-500 gave the stronger repaired Achilles tendon.

Tested in animals: in a 2026 Turkish study, 32 rats had an Achilles tendon cut and stitched, then got BPC-157, TB-500, both, or nothing for four weeks, 8 rats per group. Tendons from the TB-500 group held more load before breaking than untreated tendons and scored better on two tissue-damage scales. The BPC-157 group's scores also improved, but its totals were not clearly different from untreated rats. Rats given both did no better than rats given either one (Biçer, 2026). The authors call the results preliminary.

Tested in animals: BPC-157 has the longer rat record. In a 2003 study, rats with a cut Achilles tendon given BPC-157 had stronger tendons, better walking scores and smaller gaps over 14 days than rats given saline (Staresinic, 2003). In rat tendon cells it made the cells migrate faster (Chang, 2011). A 2025 systematic review counted 35 preclinical studies of BPC-157 in muscle, tendon, ligament and bone injuries, and found no human safety data (Vasireddi, 2025).

Tested in people: no results yet for either. The first placebo-controlled BPC-157 injury trial, 120 people with hamstring strains in China, started recruiting in February 2026. No TB-500 injury trial is registered.

Has BPC‑157 or TB‑500 been tested in humans?

BPC-157 has been, in six small reports, none of them a controlled trial for an injury. TB-500 has not: FDA searched in 2026 and found no study that gave it to a person.

Tested in people: the only placebo-controlled BPC-157 studies are two enema trials run by the drug company Pliva and published only as meeting abstracts. In 32 healthy men, 24 got BPC-157 and 8 got placebo, and headache and flatulence were the most common complaints in both groups. In 53 people with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis, disease scores fell 3.2 points on BPC-157 and 1.6 on placebo, a gap FDA judged not statistically clear (Ruenzi, 2005, as summarized by FDA).

Tested in people: the other three come from one Florida clinic and had no control group: 16 knee pain patients surveyed by phone, 12 women with interstitial cystitis, and 2 healthy adults given IV infusions (Lee, 2021, 2024 and 2025).

The human trials often quoted for TB-500 used full-length thymosin beta-4, a different molecule. In a 40-person IV safety study in healthy adults (four groups of 10, each with some people on placebo) there were no serious side effects over 14 days (Ruff, 2010), and a 72-person dry-eye trial of thymosin beta-4 eye drops missed both of its main goals (Sosne, 2015). A TB-500 trial in 80 people with heart disease began recruiting in China in 2026.

People in each published human study
TB-500

No published human study. FDA searched in 2026 and found none.

Patients Healthy volunteers. Tested in people. Only the two enema studies had a placebo group, and both were published only as meeting abstracts.

Can you take BPC‑157 and TB‑500 together?

No study in people has tested the pair. In the one rat study that tried it, giving both healed tendons no better than either one alone.

The only human data is 4 knee patients in the uncontrolled Florida survey who got BPC-157 plus thymosin beta-4, form not stated; 3 reported relief (Lee, 2021). FDA's adverse event database holds one report of a woman whose skin and gums darkened after injecting a research-label product containing both, and the darkening came back when she used it again. Which peptide caused it is unknown (FDA, 2026).

What nobody has tested yet

These are the questions the published studies of both drugs leave open.

  • Whether either peptide heals a tendon, ligament or muscle injury in people better than placebo.
  • Whether TB-500 does anything in a person: no human study of any kind has been published.
  • Whether the rat result, TB-500 ahead of BPC-157 for tendon strength, holds up in a second lab.
  • What the two do together in people, and whether the combination is safe.
  • Blood levels in people after an injection of either one.
  • Long-term safety, including tumor growth: BPC-157 and full-length thymosin beta-4 both grew new blood vessels in animal studies.

Full profiles of both peptides

Hear first when the BPC‑157 hamstring trial reads out

One email when a peptide trial reads out, a label changes or the FDA acts. Daily, free, every source linked.

Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between BPC-157 and TB-500?
BPC-157 is a lab-made 15-amino-acid fragment of a protein found in human gastric juice, with six small human reports. TB-500 is a lab-made 7-amino-acid fragment of thymosin beta-4 with an acetyl cap, and no published human study of its own. They share no amino acid sequence.
Is BPC-157 or TB-500 better for tendon injuries?
Neither has been tested on a tendon in people. In a 2026 study of 32 rats with a repaired Achilles tendon, TB-500 gave stronger tendons than no treatment, BPC-157 also helped but not by a statistically clear margin, and the two together added nothing. A placebo-controlled BPC-157 hamstring trial began recruiting in 2026.
Is TB-500 the same as thymosin beta-4?
No. TB-500 is only amino acids 17 to 23 of thymosin beta-4, with an acetyl group added. FDA's 2026 review says they are not the same substance. The human trials for dry eye and IV safety used the full protein, not TB-500.
Has TB-500 been tested in humans?
Not in any published study. FDA searched in 2026 and found no study that gave TB-500 to a person. A trial in 80 people with heart disease began recruiting in China in 2026 and has no results.
Can you take BPC-157 and TB-500 together?
No study in people has tested the pair. In a 2026 rat tendon study, giving both healed tendons no better than either one alone. FDA has one adverse event report of skin and gum darkening after a research-label product containing both.
Is BPC-157 or TB-500 better for gut healing?
BPC-157 is the one with gut research: rat studies of ulcers and colitis, and one 53-person ulcerative colitis enema trial in which the difference from placebo was not statistically clear. FDA reviewed TB-500 only for wound healing.
Are BPC-157 and TB-500 legal?
Neither is FDA-approved, and as of October 2026 US pharmacies cannot legally compound either one. An FDA advisory committee voted 8-6 in July 2026 to recommend both for compounding; FDA has not published a rule.
Are BPC-157 and TB-500 banned in sport?
Yes. WADA's 2026 Prohibited List names BPC-157 under S0, non-approved substances, and TB-500 under S2 growth factors. Both are banned in and out of competition.